Search

Search

Course syllabus Militarism and Militarisation in the Study of War: Conceptual Debates

Swedish name: Militarism och militarisering i studiet av krig: konceptuella debatter

Course code:
2KR036
Valid from semester:
Spring Term 2026
Education cycle:
Second cycle
Scope:
7.5 credits
Progression:
A1N
Grading scale:
Three-grade scale
Main field of study:
War Studies
Department:
Department of War Studies
Subject:
War Studies
Language of instruction:
The teaching is conducted in English.
Decided by:
Forsknings och utbildningsnämndens kursplaneutskott (KUS)
Decision date:
2025-08-20

Entry requirements

180 credits, of which 90 credits must be in War Studies or another similar subject. In addition, a level of proficiency in the English language, corresponding to English 6/English B or equivalent (for example, IELTS level 6.5 and above) is required.

Course content and structure

In the course the student examines three important concepts in the study of war: Militarism, militarisation and martial politics. Militarism, militarisation and martial politics are interrelated and interdisciplinary concepts. Studying these help explore question about the knowledge, practice, and effect of contemporary warfare.

In the first part of the course the student will be introduced to critical military studies, militarisation and martial politics. What is militarism and where does it stem from? What does it mean for a state, institution, person or a process to be militarized? How can we study militarism, and how do we explore its workings in everyday and intimate spheres? Why have some called for martial politics to replace militarism as a way to understand the operations of war?

In the second part of the course the student will take a closer look at the everyday and intimate workings of militarisation, and its gendered, classed and racialized effects and colonial roots. The student will trace how militarism operates across supposedly domestic or civilian spheres such as the home, fashion, bodies and fitness, and how militarisation as a lens can be used to understand military preparedness and warmaking among both state and non-state actors, including in Sweden today.

The course ends with an independently written assignment where the student synthesizes the literature using a critical and analytical approach.

Type of instruction 


Instruction is in the form of lectures and seminars.

Objectives

Upon completion of the course the student should be able to:

Knowledge and understanding
  • systematically compare and contrast different conceptual approaches for understanding war 
  • analyse the relation between different conceptual understandings of war and knowledge about war

Competence and skills
  • problematise theoretical assumptions about war using different conceptual approaches
  • apply the theoretical perspectives used in the course to contemporary examples

Judgement and approach
  • independently and critically reason about the epistemological assumptions embedded in different conceptual approaches.

Examination formats

The course is assesed through active and constructive participation in the mandatory seminars and through a written assignment.

The examiner may decide to request supplementary assignments in order to achieve a passing grade on the course. Supplementary assignments shall be submitted no later than three working days after the result and supplementary assignment for the examination in question have been notified. Examination papers submitted late will not be graded unless special circumstances exist that are acceptable to the examiner.

Grading


The student is graded on a three-point grading scale: Fail (U), Pass (G) and Pass with Distinction (VG). Grading criteria are reported at the latest at the start of the course.

To achieve the grade Pass (G), the student must actively and constructively participate in mandatory seminars and achieve a grade of Pass (G) on the written assignment.

To achieve the grade Pass with Distinction (VG) in the course, the student must meet the requirements for Pass (G) and achieve a grade of Pass with Distinction (VG) on the written assignment.

Restrictions in Number of Examinations


There is no limit on the total number of examination opportunities.

Transitional provisions

When the course is no longer offered or when the course content has changed substantially, the student has the right to be examined once per semester during a three-term period in accordance with this syllabus.

Other regulations

  • The course cannot be included in a degree with another course whose content fully or partially corresponds to the content of this course.
  • If the Swedish Defence University has formally decided that the student is entitled to receive special educational support due to a disability, the examiner may decide on alternative forms of examination for the student.
  • The course director will conduct an evaluation on the completion of the course, which will form the basis for any changes to the course.
Reading list decided date: 2026-02-09
Barkawi, Tarak. 2016. ‘Decolonising war’. European Journal of International Security, 1:2, pp. 199-214.
Basham, V. Belkin, A & Gifkins, J. 2015. ‘What is Critical Military Studies?’, Critical Military Studies, 1:1, pp. 1-2.
Basham V & Catignani, S. 2018. ‘War is where the hearth is: gendered labor and the everyday reproduction of the geopolitical in the army reserves’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 20:2, pp. 153-171.
Berndtsson, J. 2014. ‘Realizing the “market-state”? Military transformation and security outsourcing in Sweden’. International Journal, 69:4, pp. 542–558.
Bousquet, A., Grove, J., & Shah, N. 2020. ‘Becoming war: Towards a martial empiricism’. Security Dialogue, 51:2–3, pp. 99–118.

Chisholm, A & Ketola, K. 2020. ‘The Cruel Optimism of Militarism: Feminist Curiosity, Affect, and Global Security’, International Political Sociology, 14: 3, pp 270–285.
Cock, J. 2005. ‘”Guards and Guns”: Towards Privatised Militarism in Post-Apartheid South Africa’. Journal of Southern African Studies, 21:4, pp. 791-803.
Cockburn, C. &, Enloe. C 2012. ‘Militarism, Patriarchy and Peace Movements’. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 14:4, pp. 550-557.
Conway, D. 2012. ‘Soldiers, Citizens and Strangers’ in Masculinities, militarisation and the End Conscription Comparison. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 17-31.
Crane-Seeber, J. P. 2016. ‘Sexy warriors: the politics and pleasures of submission to the state’. Critical Military Studies, 2: 1-2, pp. 41-55.
Danielsson, A. 2022. ‘Knowledge in and of military operations: enriching the reflexive gaze in critical research on the military’, Critical Military Studies, 8:3, pp. 315-333.
Enloe, C. 2000. “How Do They Militarize a Can Of Soup?” in The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives, Berkeley, California: University of California Press, pp. 1-34.
Enloe, C. 2015. ‘The recruiter and the sceptic: a critical feminist approach to military studies’, Critical Military Studies,1:1, pp. 3-10.
Ericson M & Wester, M. 2021. ‘If I tell you I will have to kill you: secrecy in public administration in a time of securitization and militarization’, Critical Studies on Security, 10:1, pp 43-54.
Gauthier Vela, Vanessa. 2021. ‘MINUSMA and the Militarization of UN Peacekeeping’. International Peacekeeping, 28:5, pp. 838-863.
Gelot, Linnéa (2017) Civilian protection in Africa: How the protection of civilians is being militarized by African policymakers and diplomats, Contemporary Security Policy, 38:1.
Gelot, Linnéa, and Stig J. Hansen. 2019. “They are From Within us: CVE Brokerage in South-Central Somalia.” Conflict, Security & Development 19 (6): 563–582.
Gray, H. 2022. ‘The power of love: how love obscures domestic labour and shuts down space for critique of militarism in the autobiographical accounts of British military wives’, Critical Military Studies, 9:3, pp. 346-363.
Hedström, J. 2022. ‘Militarized social reproduction: women’s labour and parastate armed conflict’, Critical Military Studies, 8:1, pp. 58-76.
Howell, A. 2018. ‘Forget “militarization”: race, disability and the “martial politics” of the police and of the university’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 20:2, pp. 117-136.
Larsson, S. 2024. The Military Academy as a Civilizing Institution: A Historical Sociology of the Academization of Officer Education in Sweden. Armed Forces & Society, 0(0).
MacKenzie, M, et al. 2019. ‘Can we really “forget” militarization? A conversation on Alison Howell’s martial politics’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 21:5, pp. 816-836.

Massey, Rachel and Thom Tyerman. 2023. ‘Remaining ‘in-between’ the divides? Conceptual, methodological, and ethical political dilemmas of engaged research in Critical Military Studies’. Critical Studies on Security, 11:2, pp. 64-82.
McSorley K. 2016. ‘Doing military fitness: physical culture, civilian leisure, and militarism’, Critical Military Studies, 2:1-2, pp. 103-119.
Olivius, E. & Hedström, J. 2019. ‘Militarized Nationalism as a Platform for Feminist Mobilization?: The Case of the Exiled Burmese Women’s Movement’. Women's Studies: International Forum, 76: 102263.
Rossdale, C. 2019. ‘Dis/Obedience’ in Resisting militarism: direct actions and the politics of subversion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 206-236.
Spanner, L. 2022, ‘Resilient and entrepreneurial military spouses: neoliberalization meets militarization’, Critical Military Studies, 8:3, pp 233-253.
Srila R. 2009. ‘The Ethical Ambivalence of Resistant Violence: Notes From Postcolonial South Asia’, Feminist Review, 91, pp. 135 -153.
Stavrianakis, A, & Selby. J. 2012. “Militarism and international relations in the twenty-first century” in Stavrianakis, A, & Selby. J (eds) Militarism and International Relations: Political economy, Security, Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 3-18.
Stern, M & Strand, S. 2022. ‘Periods, Pregnancy, and Peeing: Leaky Feminine Bodies in Swedish Military Marketing’, International Political Sociology, 16: 1, pp. 1-21.
Tidy, J. 2019. ‘War craft: The embodied politics of making war’. Security Dialogue, 50:3, pp. 220-238.
Total number of pages: 572