Course syllabus Research Design and Methods, War Studies

Swedish name: Forskningsdesign och analysmetoder, krigsvetenskap

Course code:
2KR030
Valid from semester:
Autumn Term 2025
Education cycle:
Second cycle
Scope:
15.0 credits
Progression:
A1N
Grading scale:
Three-grade scale
Main field of study:
War Studies
Department:
Department of War Studies and Military History
Subject:
War Studies
Language of instruction:
The teaching is conducted in English.
Decided by:
Institutionen för krigsvetenskap
Decision date:
2025-05-05

Entry requirements

Officer's degree or bachelor's degree of 180 credits, of which 90 credits are in War Studies or an equivalent subject. English skills equivalent to English B or English 6.

Course content and structure

Designing coherent and consistent research is essential for studying political and social phenomena. Good research plays a fundamental role in understanding and explaining war and peace, as well as crisis management, security and defence policies. This course offers the student a broad overview of existing approaches, methods and research tools in war studies and political science. In addition to learning specific analytical methods, the course aims to provide students with the necessary skills to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of various approaches to research, including ethical considerations when conducting research. The course introduces different ways of looking at how we can achieve new knowledge and how reliable research designs can be constructed. In a neopositivist part of 7.5 credits and an interpretive part of 7.5 credits of the course the student builds skills to independently analyse and conduct scientific investigations.

Type of Instruction


  • Lectures
  • Seminars

Objectives

After completing the course, the student is expected to be able to:

Skills and abilities
  • apply relevant social science concepts related to various research traditions,

Judgment and approach
  • compare and contrast different research methods,
  • independently assess the strengths and weaknesses of different research designs,
  • critically evaluate methodological choices in published research,
  • develop an appropriate research design to address a given research problem.

Examination formats

Assessment takes place individually through the submission of two on-campus written examinations and active participation in mandatory seminars.

One examination covers the neo-positivist part of the course and the other examination covers the interpretive part. Each examination is equivalent to 7,5 credits of the final grade.

The examiner may decide to request supplementary assignments in order to achieve a passing grade on the course. Supplementary assignments shall be submitted no later than ten working days after the result and supplementary assignment for the examination in question have been notified. Examination papers submitted late will not be graded unless special circumstances exist that are acceptable to the examiner.

Grading


To earn the grade Pass with Distinction (VG) in the course, the student must actively participate in the mandatory seminars, and earn a grade of Pass with Distinction for both individual on-campus written examinations.

To earn the grade Pass (G) in the course, the student must actively participate in the mandatory seminars, and earn a grade of Pass for both individual on-campus written examinations.

Grading criteria are presented no later than at the start of the course.

Restrictions in Number of Examinations


There is no limit on the total number of examination opportunities.

Transitional provisions

When the course is no longer offered or when the course content has changed substantially, the student has the right to be examined once per semester during a three-term period in accordance with this syllabus.

Other regulations

The course cannot be part of a degree with course whose content matches the content of this course in whole or in part.

On completion of the course, an evaluation will be conducted under the auspices of the course director and serve as the basis for any changes to the course.

If the Swedish Defence Univerity has formally decided that the student is entitled to receive special educational support due to disability, the examiner may decide on alternative forms of examination for the student.
Reading list decided date: 2022-08-23
Auchter, J (2016) “Playing war and genocide: Engame: Syria and Darfur is Dying” In Hamilton, C and LJ Shepherd (eds) Understanding popular culture and world politics in the digital age. London: Routledge, pp. 121-136.

Asal, V., Conrad, J., & Toronto N. (2017). I Want You! The Determinants of Military Conscription, Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(7), 1456-1481.

Beach, D & Pedderson, R.B. (2019). Process tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan press, pp.1-12

Bennett, A. (2010) Case study methods: Design, use and comparative advantages. In Nahmias-Walinsky, Y, ed. Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations, pp. 19-48. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press

Bevir, M. & Rhodes, R.A.W. (2016). Interpretive Political Science: Mapping the field. In M. Bevir and R.A.W. Rhodes, eds. Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science, pp. 3-29. London; New York: Routledge.

Bleiker, R. (2016). Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics. Millennium, 43(3), 872-890.

Butler, J (2009) Frames of War: When is life grievable? London: Verso Books. Chapter 1 “Precarious Life, Grievable Life” (pp. 1-32).

Campbell, D. (2018) “Famine” In Bleiker, A (ed.) Visual Global Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 127-133.

Carson, A. (2016). Facing Off and Saving Face: Covert Intervention and Escalation Management in the Korean War. International Organization 70(1): 103-131. (26 pages)

Crilley, R (2016) “Like and share forces: Making sense of military social media sites” In Hamilton, C and LJ Shepherd (eds) Understanding popular culture and world politics in the digital age. London: Routledge, pp. 51-67.

Der Derian, J (2018) “War” Lee-Koo, K (2018) “Children” In Bleiker, A (ed) Visual Global Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 328-331.

Ekengren, M. (2002). The Time of European Governance. Manchester University Press. Ch 3

Ekengren, M., & Hollis, S. (2019) Explaining the European Union’s Security Role in Practice, Journal of Common Market Studies.

Gentry, CE & Whitworth, K (2011) The discourse of desperation: The intersection of neo-orientalism, gender, and Islam in the Chechen struggle, Critical Studies on Terrorism 4(2): 145-161.

Harding, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press., Ch. 8: “The Birth of Modern Science as a Text: Internalist and Externalist Stories (pp.197-216).” & Ch. 9: “Problems with Post-Kuhnian Stories (pp.216-243)”.

Haste, H., Jones, J., & Monroe, K. (2018). Political Psychology. In Bevir, Mark and R.A.W. Rhodes (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science. New York, NY: Routledge. Ch. 22

Hollis, M. (1994). The Philosophy of social science: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ch. 1 & 9

Infantino, F. (2016). State-bound Visa Policies and Europeanized Practices. Comparing EU Visa Policy Implementation in Morocco, Journal of Borderlands Studies, 31:2, 171-186

Jackson, P.T. (2011). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. New York; London: Routledge. Chapter 3, pp.41-72.

Kaempf, S “Digital Media” In Bleiker, A (ed) Visual Global Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 99-103.

Käihkö, I. (2016). Bush Generals and Small Boy Battalions: Military Cohesion in Liberia and Beyond. Phd. diss.: Uppsala University., pp. 47-61. http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A918765&dswid=614
Käihkö, I. (2018). Conflict Chatnography: Instant messaging apps, social media and conflict ethnography in Ukraine. Ethnography, https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138118781640.
Kellstedt, P. M., & Whitten. G.D. (2013). The fundamentals of Political Science Research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (chapters: 1,3-4, 6-7; 8-9; 10-11)

Kuus, M. (2013) ‘Foreign Policy and Ethnography: A skeptical Intervention’. Geopolitics, No. 18, pp. 115-131.

Lacina, B. (2006). Explaining the Severity of Civil Wars, Journal of Conflict Resolution50(2), 276-289

Lee-Koo, K (2018) “Children” In Bleiker, A (ed) Visual Global Politics. London: Routledge, pp.48-54.

Lynch, Cecilia (2014) “Critical Interpretation and Interwar Peace Movements. Challenging Dominant Narratives” In Yanow, Dvora and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea (eds.) Interpretation and Method Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. Ch. 16, pp. 300-308.

McBride, K & ATR Wibben (2012) The Gendering of Counterinsurgency in Afghanistan, Humanity 3(2): 199-215.

Moeller, SD (2018) “Compassion fatigue” In Bleiker, A (ed) Visual Global Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 75-80 .

Pouliot, V (2012) Methodology: putting practice theory into practice. In: Adler-

Nissen, R (ed.) Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking the Key Concepts in IR. London: Routledge, pp.46–58.

Robinson, P (2018) “The CNN effect” In Bleiker, A, ed. (2018) Visual Global Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 62-67.

Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2012) Interpretive Research Design. Concepts and Processes. New York, NY: Routledge. Ch. Introduction, 1-3. Pp. 1-53., Ch. 6 pp.91-112.

Seawright, J., & John G. (2008) Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options”. Political Research Quarterly 61(2): 294-30.

Tuhiwai-Smith, L (2012) Decolonizing methodologies. London: Zed Books. Chapter 2: “Research through imperial eyes” pp. 44-60.

Weldes, J., (2014) High Politics and Low Data. Globalization Discourses in Popular Culture. In Yanow, Dvora and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea (eds.) Interpretation and Method Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. Ch. 12, Pp. 228-238.

Whyte, W. F. (1993). Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum. Fourth edition. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 279-373.

Wibben, A.T.R., ed. (2016). Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics. London; New York: Routledge.

Wight, C. (2012). Philosophy of the Social Science and International Relations. in: Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T., & Simmons, B., eds. (2012). Handbook of international relations. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Reading list decided date: 2025-06-19
Abedi Dunia, Oscar, Maria Eriksson Baaz, Anju Oseema Maria Toppo, Swati Parashar, Mats Utas & James B.M. Vincent (2023). Visibilising Hidden Realities and Uncertainties: The ‘Post-Covid’ Move Towards Decolonized and Ethical Field Research Practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 26(5): 549–564.
Aradau, Claudia & Andrew Hill (2013). The Politics of Drawing: Children, Evidence, and the Darfur Conflict. International Political Sociology 7(4): 368–387.
Asal, Victor, Justin Conrad & Nathan Toronto (2017). I Want You! The Determinants of Military Conscription. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(7): 1456–1481.
Axyonova, Vera & Katsiaryna Lozka (2023). ‘We are at War’: Reflections on Positionality and Research as Negotiation in Post-2022 Ukraine. Journal of International Relations and Development. Online first.
Beach, Derek & Rasmus Brun Pedersen (2019). Process Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 1–12.
Bennett, Andrew (2010) Case Study Methods: Design, Use and Comparative Advantages. In Nahmias-Walinsky, Yael (ed.) Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations: 19–48. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
Bevir, Mark & R.A.W. Rhodes (2016). Interpretive Political Science: Mapping the Field. In Bevir, Mark & R.A.W. Rhodes (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science: 3–29. London: Routledge.
Bochner, Arthur P. and Andrew F. Herrman (2020). Practicing Narrative Inquiry II: Making Meanings Move. In Leavy, Patricia (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research: 285–325. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Booth, Wayne C., Colomb, Gregory G., Williams, Joseph M., Bizup, Joseph and William T. Fitzgerald (2016). The Craft of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 4th ed.: chap. 3–5.
Brancati, Dawn (2018). Social Scientific Research. London: Sage: 199-207.
Carson, Austin (2016). Facing Off and Saving Face: Covert Intervention and Escalation Management in the Korean War. International Organization 70(1): 103–131.
Fairclough, Norman and Isabela Fairclough (2015). Textual Analysis. In Bevir, M. & Rhodes, R. A. W. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science: 186-198. London: Routledge.
Fujii, Lee Ann (2012). Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS Political Science & Politics 45(4): 717–723.
Gentry, Caron E. (2016) Chechen Political violence as desperation: What feminist discourse analysis reveals. In Wibben, ATR (ed.) Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics: 19–37. London; New York: Routledge.
George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge & London: MIT Press: chap. 9.
Gerring, John (1999). What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity 31(3): 357–393.
Gieseking, Jack Jen (2013). Where we go from here: The mental sketch mapping method and its analytic components. Qualitative Inquiry 19(9): 712-724.
Harding, Sandra (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press: chap. 8 (197–216) & chap. 9 (216–243).
Hollis, Martin (1994). The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: chap. 1 & 9.
Hollis, Simon. (2015). The Role of Regional Organizations in Disaster Risk Management. London. Palgrave Macmillan: chap. 6.
Holm, Gunilla (2020). Photography as a Research Method. In Leavy, Patricia (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research: 569–594. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, Patrick T. (2011). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. London: Routledge: chap. 3 (41–72).
Kellstedt, Paul M., & Guy D. Whitten (2018). The Fundamentals of Political Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3rd edition.
Mbohou, Léger Félix Ntienjom and Sule Tomkinson. Rethinking Elite Interviews Through Moments of Discomfort: The Role of Information and Power. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 21: 1–10.
Powner, Leanne C. (2015). Empirical Research and Writing: A Political Science Student’s Practical Guide. London: CQ Press: 168–171.
Ricks, Jacob I., and Amy H. Liu (2008). Process-tracing Research Designs: A Practical Guide. PS: Political Science & Politics 51(4): 842–846.
Ruffa, Chiara, and Ralph Sundberg (2018). Breaking the Frame: Frame Disputes of War and Peace. Acta Sociologica 61(3): 317–332.
Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine & Dvora Yanow (2012). Interpretive Research Design. Concepts and Processes. New York: Routledge.
Seawright, J., & John Gerring (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly 61(2): 294–308.
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai (2012). Research through Imperial Eyes. In Decolonizing Methodologies. London: Zed Books: 44–60.
Spray, Sharon & Laura Roselle (2011) Research and Writing in International Relations. 2nd edition: 15–31. Boston: Longman.
Spray, Sharon & Laura Roselle (2011b) Research and Writing in International Relations. 2nd edition: 46–66. Boston: Longman.
Svend, Brinkmann (2020). Unstructured and Semistructured Interviewing. In Leavy, Patricia (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research: 424–456. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2023). What the Act Says.

Tripp, Aili Mari (2018) Transparency and Integrity in Conducting Field Research on Politics in Challenging Contexts. Perspectives on Politics 16(3): 728–738.
Vastapuu, Leena (2018). Auto-Photographing (In)Securities: Former Young Female Soldiers’ Post-War Struggles in Monrovia. In Saugman, Rune & Juha A. Vuori (eds.): Visual Security Studies: Sights and Spectacles of Insecurity and War. London: Routledge: 171–187.
Viceré, Maria Giulia Amadio (2021). Externalizing EU Crisis Management: EU Orchestration of the OSCE during the Ukrainian Conflict. Contemporary Security Policy 42(4): 498–529.
Walldorf Jr, C. William (2022). Narratives and War: Explaining the Length and End of US Military Operations in Afghanistan. International Security 47(1): 93–138.

Weldes, Jutta (2014). High Politics and Low Data. Globalization Discourses in Popular Culture. In Yanow, Dvora & Peregrine Schwartz-Shea (eds.) Interpretation and Method Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe: 228–238.
Wibben, Annick T.R., ed. (2016). Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics. London: Routledge.
Wibben, Annick T.R. (2016). Female Engagement Teams in Afghanistan: Exploring the ‘War on Terror’ Narrative. In Wibben, Annick T.R. (ed.) Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics: 57–75. London; New York: Routledge.
Wight, Colin (2012). Philosophy of the Social Science and International Relations. In Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse & Beth A. Simmons (eds.) Handbook of International Relations. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 2nd ed.